They Found The Bible Was Wrong

 January 21, 2015

Cordoba, Spain can be considered an Alexandria of the west, (as opposed to Alexandria, Egypt), for over 300 years, its influence on western learning was enormous. This was at that time the largest city in Europe, it boasted 80 thousand market stalls, 900 bath houses – remember that the rest of Europe was festering in personal filth and disease, and close to 1000 mosques, add to that many Christian churches, and Jewish synagogues. All these functioned normally under the Islamic hierarchy, something that could not be said for the rest of Europe. Cordoba was a place of learning with a couple of libraries housing over 400,000 books.

Cordoba led the world in mysticism, science, and technology, most people think that these came to us through Jewish practices; they really came to us through Islam with a hint of Judaic philosophy. Thanks to this place the west was opened to medicine, astrology, geography, agriculture, pure mathematics, the fact that planetary orbits are not circular but ovoid, thus beating Johannes Kepler by centuries. Unlike the Christian Church, Islam, in its infancy, never rejected the ancient knowledge of the territories they took over, it simply took that information and translated it into Arabic and disseminated it throughout the empire. Hmm, what did the Roman Catholic Church do to north, central, South America, Africa, Japan, and everywhere else it went? Crushed the local belief systems is what they did.

It’s thanks to Islam that we have the three-course meal - soup, meat, desert was introduced to Europe. So was Sugar Cane. Up until then Europe sweetened itself with honey. Most Christian rulers insisted on having Muslim doctors. These doctors kept themselves clean, performed Cesarean sections, and sterilized surgical instruments. They translated Hippocrates, and Galen into Arabic, and even found correctly that Galen could often be wrong. So what do all these things have in common? In a word, SERVICE.  Cordoba also boasted a standing army of at least 100,000 men, and it took the GDP of one-third of the country to maintain it. Many of the governmental departments that we have today are based on Cordoba’s model, trade, finance, justice,

diplomacy and defense. They had a fine court system as well that protected commercial interests and personal ones with equality.

Shifting focus now a little, we know how the church in general and the Roman Catholic Church in particular feels about women in the clergy, we at WHD find this position to be incredibly foolish. In the tenth century AD the Papacy was led by a women dubbed Pope Joan, she disguised herself as a man and gave birth in a street during a procession going back to Rome. Pope John X – 914 – 928 AD was an adulterous S.O.B. because the woman named Theadora was married to Theophilact, a Greek patrician. She married her daughter Marozia to Pope Sergius III 904 – 911 AD, and their son became Pope John XI 931 – 935 AD. Marozia’s grandson by her second marriage became Pope John XII 955 – 964 AD. HMM adultery, divorce, cross-dressing, not to mention pedophilia, at least in today’s world has caused the catholic church to have wandered far from its “Holy Purpose”. We are not quite finished with Marozia though, after the death of Sylvester II her two great grandsons became Popes Benedict VIII 1012 – 1024 AD and Pope John XIX. Benedict was pope three times, 1012 – 1024, then again in 1045, and then finally in 1047 – 1048, he died in 1049. Having sold the office to Gregorius VI and Damasus II. It may interest you to know that Sylvester II was Jewish, and was closely related to the Grail bloodline. Sylvester II in many small ways began to set seeds growing that would ultimately lead to the first crusade.

There has been a lot written about the crusades, most of it gets tied up in how it was a Christian thing fighting against the unholy Muslim tides. In many respects, this is simply inaccurate. In 1096 when the first crusade began, we must remember that Cordoba had been and still was a major learning center for the European nobility and, that these families were still heavily influenced by their Judaic/Essene/Grail family nobility. When Hugues de Vermandois, Godfroid de Bouillon – Duke of Lower Lorraine, and his brother Baudouin, Bohemund and Tancred of Sicily, Raymond de Toulouse, Robert de Flanders, Robert de Normandie, Etienne de Blois – Count of Boulogne, and Adhemar, papal legate and bishop of Puy, all closely related to one another decided to embark on this first crusade, the conspiracy was huge. They wanted to do no less than put a Grail king back on his rightful throne in Palestine and have him rule an empire the size of King Solomon’s’. This effort was never conceived by a pope; in fact, the last thing these guys wanted was papal interference.

Yes, there was unquestionably a religious aspect to the crusade, but not in the way you may think. As stated previously when Islam invaded a territory they would guarantee the safety of the inhabitants of the area, and indeed, they did. The problem was when the Byzantines – Turks turned to Islam and invaded new areas; they would burn, rape, and pillage often leaving nothing but wonton destruction in their wake. This type of behavior was of course against the tenets of Islam and provided reason enough alone for someone to stage an intervention. Remember that these guys had been taught by mostly Muslim scholars where they had been steeped in Islamic poetry, where the grail romances and legends, had programmed them towards chivalry and service. Jerusalem was eventually reached on June 7, 1099

It was a savage victory. Christian troops slaughtered the resident civilian population.

and fell on July 15, 1099 AD, there has been a lot written about how the Templars excavated under the Temple of Solomon, to some extent this is true, however, having dug down to the level of the first temple, they could find no evidence of its foundation. So the obvious question was where was it?

To help answer that we must delve into somewhat strange territory, in almost everything written about the Templars, the Templars being a Christian order. When we learned how Islam felt about the Roman Catholic Church, it seems utterly impossible that a Muslim leader would make a treaty with an RC one. Seeing as how the founding members of the Knight Templar were schooled by Muslims, and that their families were inter-married with the Islamic hierarchy in Cordoba, and that lineage takes them back to Muhammad, and on back through time to Jesus; and the ancient grail kings of old, is it not possible that the Templars were actually Muslim instead of Christian? There is a story of a Frankish knight finding a Muslim praying towards Mecca under the Dome of the Rock, losing his temper the knight told this fellow that he was praying in the wrong direction. Later this knight was read the riot act by his fellow knights and told that he should not again enter the place until he had learned some manners and tolerance. While this is far from conclusive evidence, it does indicate the sympathetic leanings of the majority of the Templars.

Clots of blood

February 8, 2015

 

The Umayyad Empire

When the Umayyad’s came into the political picture, it was time for further Islamic expansion,in fact, the seat of Islam was moved from Mecca to Damascus, which had been a Byzantine Christian stronghold up until 635 AD. Damascus’ surrender actually set the pattern for all future surrenders/conquests. The Umayyad’s had taken over the reins of power from Alis’ sons, Al-Hasan, and Al-Husayn

The formal terms of surrender read “In the name of Allah, the merciful, the compassionate, this is what Khalid ibn al-Walid would grant to the inhabitants of Damascus… He promises to give them security for their lives, property, and churches. Their city shall not be demolished; neither shall any Muslim be quartered in their houses. Thereunto we give to them the pact of Allah and the protection of His Prophet, the Khalife and the believers. So long as they pay the tax. Nothing but good shall befall them”

There have been many things said and written about the evil hordes of Muslims invading Spain, like the 1963 movie The Castilian. 

 This attitude could not be more wrong, I do not even like admitting crap like this exists. The plain truth of it is, without Islam being invited to come to Spain in 711 AD, Europe might never have started to climb out of the cesspool of ignorance, and scientific stagnation that the Holy Roman Church held it in.

The Spanish Empire

as we know it today, it is ruled by King Juan Carlos I, and did not really come into being until 1474 AD, some 150 years after Scotland regained our independence at the battle of Bannockburn. Spain had originally been part of the Roman Empire before falling to the Vandals, and again to the Visigoths in the fifth century AD. Toledo had been the Visigoth capital before it fell to the Moors in 711 AD. Part of the reason it fell was because that they should and would travel and trade freely throughout the empire. Catholicism had been imposed on the Jews, they had been threatened with death and slavery if they didn’t conform to the “Christian” catholic faith. It is important that we remember that at that time, more Jews lived outside of Judaea. than in it, even during Christ’s time. I find it to be an odd twist that the Roman Emperor Julius Caesar who died in 44 AD declared the Jews friends of the Roman Empire and decreed it.

he Visigoths were a powerful Germanic people who played a significant role in the late Roman Empire and the early Middle Ages. They were known for their military prowess, their sack of Rome in 410 AD, and the establishment of a Visigothic Kingdom in Iberia (present-day Spain and Portugal).  Germanic Origins, The Visigoths were a branch of the broader Gothic people, a Germanic group that migrated from Scandinavia and Eastern Europe. The Visigoths initially interacted with the Roman Empire as foederati (allies), but later clashed with the empire, ultimately defeating them at the Battle of Adrianople in 378  AD.  Sack of Rome: 

In 410 AD, the Visigoths, led by Alaric I, sacked Rome, a significant event in the decline of the Western Roman Empire. After the sack of Rome, the Visigoths established a kingdom in Gaul (present-day France) and then in Iberia, where they ruled for several centuries. The Visigoths were Arian Christians, a theological sect that was not recognized as orthodox by the dominant Christian church.  The Visigoths left a lasting cultural and linguistic influence on the Iberian Peninsula, contributing to the development of Spanish and Portuguese languages and customs.  

Their way of of royal succession was a bit different, after King Witiza died, his son Prince Agilla thought that he should inherit the throne by right of primogeniture, as was the way of most of the rest of Europe but Visigoth royal succession was not hereditary, but elective. The Visigoths elected a guy named Rodrigo to be king, so Agilla invited the Islamic Moors of North Africa to side with him in what amounted to a civil war. North African involvement in Spanish affairs really should not come as a surprise; both areas had traded, and had been part of the Roman Empire. North Africa had been conquered by Islam, when the exarchate of Carthage, now in Tunisia succumbed to the Umayyad’s in 698 AD. The Moors were quick to answer the call; they sent the governor of Tangiers Tariq ibn Ziad with crack troops.

The Jews of Spain were grateful for his arrival, as stated earlier, Islam recognizes Judaism and Christianity as equals. By 732 AD the Umayyad Empire stretched for over 4000 miles, and trade flourished. However not all of Visigoth Spain followed suit, yes Catholicism was entrenching itself as was Islam, but, the Celtic Church was also entrenched in Gallicia, 

and had at least two sees functioning in Bretona, and Santiago de Compostella as well as Sintra in Portugal. The Roman Catholic Church claims that it had wiped out the Celtic Church by 662 AD but, thanks to independent Spanish church records, we find that the Celtic Church operated until at least 800 AD. Fascinatingly the Islamic hierarchy saw the Celtic Church as far more acceptable than its Roman Catholic cousin. Why? Well the answer is twofold.

The first is because the Celtic Church sprung from the Syrian Church and its proper Hebraic hierarchy answered to the Church of Jerusalem, which had been essentially founded by James, Jesus’ brother. The second of course was Alexandrian – Egyptian which, was influenced by the Hellenistic trend of worship. We also find that, as with Islam, the Celtic Church was vehemently anti Rome, it gave equal rights to women, and that the priesthood was hereditary.

All this aside for a moment, the one thing that gets me about religion especially Christian is, not once have we ever been shown a document that Christ himself wrote. Every page of the Bible has been written at least 200 years after Christ’ death. The Koran, in some ways, is worse because it wasn’t wrote until roughly 632 years later, however, I do believe that the Koran seeks to be far more honest with its followers. I really don’t like to broach this topic however; here seems a good place to do so. As terrifying as the events of September 11 2001 were, that event was the responsibility of religious fundamentalists, not an entire population of believers. In many ways Islam is/was going through simply what Christianity did from its conception till now even. As you will recall these articles are full of the brutality that the Christian church perpetrated on other Christians, Jews, Catholics vs. protestants, and church leaders spewing vitriol against Muslims in churches now. We here at Kristuzac profoundly reject any/all type of religious fundamentalism, it’s not a contest of who’s God is bigger and badder, it’s about understanding where we came from, who God really is, and appreciating Him for this gift of life. We are beings of light and energy, we do not need to enslave ourselves to a God, He is in every one of us. ENKI & Ninharsag, they started it all from as the Koran says “from clots of blood”.

A 3,000 year old mystery

February 9, 2016

So we remember this guy, Mr. Hiram the only reference I can find in the bible is Genesis 49:6, which talks about a killing of a Theban King. The book of Ezekiel talks about the prophet forcibly getting rid of all things Egyptian, and bringing the Israeli’s back to YHWH/ENLIL. I don’t know if Seqenenre Tao is Hiram Abif, but his death may help explain Ezekiel’s attempt to show God/ENLIL’s inability to protect his temple from his enemies. One thing is for sure though, we’re onto something here!

We know through the Dead Sea Scrolls that Jesus and his brothers were completely different characters than how the church portrays them. Jesus had little interest in things outside his little kingdom, when he said brothers and neighbors he was talking about people in his community at Qumran. With our new understanding of Jesus, the Lord’s Prayer turns into something uniquely Jewish and really goes like this “ENLIL, great is your name. Israel will become your kingdom. The requirements of holy living that you abide by will be instituted in Israel. Sustain us in the time before your kingdom is in place. Forgive us if we fall short of your holy requirements, as we forgive those that let us down. And do not make life too harsh for us to test our resolve, but help us to avoid errors in our own holy endeavors. Israel is yours, and the power to rule us and the splendor, for all time. Let it be so. If you look at Peakes Commentary on the Bible, it is an excellent source of further information. Purchase

 it becomes immediately clear that Jesus only had one thing on his mind, kicking Rome’s arse out of Israel forever.As we’ve discovered Jesus was an aristocrat, and his family was quite wealthy. It was not uncommon for him to mingle with tax collectors, and high priests of the Pharisees, and Sadducees, most of these people were not admitted into the secrets of the Essenes, as a result they were called harlots, in Jesus’ day the word merely meant gentiles; it had nothing to do with sexuality. We’ve talked about how Jesus didn’t die, here’s what the Koran says in Sura 4:157” That they said in boast, “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the apostle of Allah” – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no certain knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of surety they killed him not”. 

The Star of David is generally recognized as being a historic symbol that reaches all the way back to Abraham, in a sense it does, but it’s not Judaic.

The top and bottom points of this star are the apex of two pyramids overlaid one upon the other. The upwards pointing pyramid is an ancient symbol for the power of a king, with its base resting on Earth and its summit reaching to Heaven. The downward pointing pyramid symbolizes the power of the priest, its base is in Heaven and it reaches down to Earth. Recall that after the great flood kingship was lowered from Heaven. This star also carries the extra meaning of being the bright star of David’s line, the planet of Nibiru.

We started this series on the dragon and we’ve seen its connection to Islam, the Templars, and these last few articles on the Templar’s descendent order, the Freemasons. In these articles we’ve tried to show as clearly as possible the biblical connection to Templarism and Freemasonry. There is still a lot to be learned in our quest for the Grail, and even know that the Masons won’t talk about it, it’s their ceremonies and disconnected lore that will provide the answers. On occasion I’ve spoken with Masons and tried to discuss various parts of the problem with them, and do you know what they’ve said? Firstly they’ve said you’re not a Mason, so I can’t talk to you. Okay fair enough, I’m not, but, by the same token in each case I could see that they desperately wanted to know and understand how it was that an outsider could understand at least as much as they didn’t. How do I know? I know because they were good enough to say so.

This isn’t meant as a criticism of our modern-day Templars, but what I do mean to say is, it would seem that their meetings are mainly used as a chance for fellowship, and not for discussion or research into their own history. To me this says that they are breaking the principles of which their order was founded on. When those original Rex Deus knights arrived in Palestine they were there to find the original Temple of Solomon, and as much information about their history as possible.

Of the probable five million Freemasons today, there are few that are from these Rex Deus families, and it’s those from these families that should be supplying the necessary historic information to their respective lodges/temples. In today’s world of religious fundamentalism we need the leadership from these families just as badly now as we did back in the dark ages.

So what are we to make of all this? Well clearly the problem was King Phillip IV and Clement V and the death of Master Jacques de Molay. Even though de Molay got his revenge after the death of the king and pope, the order still splintered into a dozen or more Templar like orders. People like Jehan Marc Larmenius of Jerusalem clouded the picture because he claimed that de Molay made him Grand Master in 1313, yes de Molay was alive in prison but the Templars didn’t have Grand Masters, they only had Masters. The only time a new Master could be elected was at the death of the preceding one. I believe the Larmenius order of Templars is fraudulent and only came into existence due to some opportunistic power seekers. The order eventually fell apart in the mid-1980s due to some kind of MI5 – (the UK”s internal security service) investigation. This order had nothing whatever to do with Freemasonry.