Israel Is In the Wrong Place

 September 7, 2016

As we continue our endeavor to learn about the correct version of biblical events, the Holy Grail, Gold/MFKZT, Freemasonry, and its connection to Islam, we left our last article with a question. Where is the foundation to the first Temple of Solomon?

The Templars were to find thanks to their affiliation with the Islamic Order of Assassins, that there was more to know about Mecca and Arabia than met the eye. That the Order of Assassins was a deadly force to be reckoned with, cannot be argued. However, when we take the root of the word assassin, assas, the name of the order now becomes, the Guardians of Knowledge. Wow! Two Gnostic (from the Greek Knosis - to know) orders doing business together for the betterment of humanity, it is no wonder the Templars reached the incredible success that they did. And, earned the jealousy, and animosity of the Catholic Church as it did.

In other articles, we have proposed the idea that Israel is somewhat mis-located. We believe that part of the reason for this is from the switch in language. The Jews before the Babylonian captivity spoke Hebrew, during the captivity they learned and spoke, Akkadian. When Cyrus the Great released the Jews circa 538 B.C., geographical knowledge was lost as the Jews learned a new language, Aramaic.

To their amazement, the Templars were to find physical proof in the northwestern deserts of Saudi Arabia. Most historians except Graham Hancock, and Tim Wallace-Murphy, would agree that the Templars didn’t make it as far south as Ethiopia, and if they didn’t, why might I ask is there Templar architecture in Ethiopian archaeological sites? Again, I think it’s a case of science being fooled by pre-conception. Not to go into too much detail, what we mean is, we are so used to thinking in the way that we’ve been taught to, and in doing so we continually trip ourselves up by it when we encounter new and radical ideas. So in short, when the new idea stares us in the face and makes terrifically good sense, we refuse to acknowledge it because it doesn’t conform to our learned expectation. Yet the new idea was precisely what we were looking for. While traveling south the Templars found near identical names of Jewish cities.

Right, now with that cleared up, in our endeavor to understand why the foundation to the Temple of Solomon isn’t where it’s supposed to be, we need to understand a little more about Mecca. You’ll recall the stone that was taken by Adam when he and Eve were kicked out of Eden, he then gave it to his son Seth, it was then passed on down through time and landed up in the hands of Noah. As we know, he made it into an altar on Mount Ararat, which is in Turkey after the flood. His descendant Abraham got hold of it and his grandson Jacob set it in the pillar to represent the ladder. Moses – Pharaoh Akhenaten carried it out of Egypt during the exodus in 1364 BC. Later Solomon discovered it during excavations for the temple in Jerusalem. This stone is a perfect cube

and engraved upon it is the name of God, Kybela. The Hebrews forgot this word during the Babylonian captivity.

This stone is supposed to be the cornerstone of the temple, so what’s it doing in Mecca? What became incredibly clear to the Templars through their excavations was the Old Testament place names could not be found in Palestine, and that something was seriously amiss. Babylon sacked Jerusalem in 586 BC and took the population of Judah to Babylon. There for, some say 50 ,and others 70 years, the Jewish people lived and became familiar with the religions of the area, and indeed, even adopted many aspects of them. In 1999 professor Zeev Herzog of Tel Aviv University said that after 70 years of intense archaeological research there is no evidence of Moses wandering for 40 years in the desert, no battles, and no proof that the Jewish kingdoms of David and Solomon were ever there.

The logical question the Templars were asking themselves was, are we in the wrong place? While traveling south the Templars found remnants of Jewish cities of the Old Testament in western Arabia, stretching from the port of Jidda to Jizzan. The discovery of these place names was documented by Lebanese professor Kamal Salibi in 1985. Israel has scoffed at this major discovery and refuses to believe that they might have it all wrong throughout the last 2,500 years.

So what do we think? We know that the mass resettlement of people is nothing new, the Americans did it in Vietnam, Hitler did it during the holocaust, the British in South Africa, so is it not entirely possible that the Persian King Cyrus simply told the Judean people in 539 BC where to settle after their release from Babylon? The obvious answer to that is, of course.

In essence what we have happening is, we have many people on the move, they’ve got no real connection to Israel except those of their grandparents. They’ve been held by thePersian King, they’re used to his government and are equally used to doing what they are told to do. Adopting a new place-name is nothing special; we have Nova Scotia, CA or New Scotland, Halifax NS, York Ontario. The Judean king at the time Zerubbabel, his name actually means born in Babel. In the biblical narrative, Zerubbabel led the first group of Jews, numbering 42,360, who returned from the Babylonian captivity in the first year of Cyrus the Great. He was of Davidic origin, Zerubbabel is thought to have originally been a Babylonian Jew who returned to Jerusalem at the head of a band of Jewish exiles and became governor of Judaea under the Persians. Influenced by the prophets Haggai and Zechariah, he rebuilt the Temple.

In a stunning twist, the Templars actually found the original Jerusalem, just a tiny village yes, but in the surrounding areas they found all the Biblical mentions of gates as we find in the Torah as well; Jeremiah 37:13, 38:7, Zechariah 14:10, 2 Kings 14:13, 11:6 Chronicles 25:23, and the list goes on. Now that the Templars knew where the right Jerusalem was, the answer to this and many other vexing old testament vs. Palestine questions could properly be answered, including the location of Sodom and Gomorrah, which of course still hasn’t been located in Palestine/ Israel.

Is Israel really the land of the Bible?

February 8, 2016

 

Fascinating stuff, finding Jewish Torah and biblical place names in western Arabia and why shouldn’t there be? We know that civilization migrated out of Sumer into Egypt, then into Israel, and the rest of the world from there. The interesting thing is though is what lies between Sumer and Egypt; western Arabia. Here’s the thing though, the Christian bible has always been the go to thing for historical data, in every instance as we’ve seen the writers of the bible have it all wrong.

In a recent article, we wrote about conspiracies and how they can be big or small; the one perpetrated on us by the Christian church is huge. The bible was written during a period of history called the dark ages, and they were dark indeed. Most of the bible was written to instill fear into the uneducated masses, for people who couldn’t read or write, and even if they could, it was written in Latin, which most folks couldn’t read or write anyway. So for most of 800 years the bible became the accepted story of how we were created, the places in the bible were real, and gradually Sumer became a myth.

A myth that is until the blessed prophet Muhammad came along and started getting a truer version of events out there. In today’s world, we find Muslim fundamentalism repugnant and think that Islam desperately needs to get its house in order. That being said, and after having met and spoken with many Muslims, we believe that Islam is a far more honest form of worship.

It would seem that our Templars felt much the same way, if they weren’t actually Muslim, they were definitely educated and sympathetic enough to be allowed into Mecca, which in 1000 AD and as now, carried a death sentence if you weren’t. In our last article, we posed the question, what was the corner stone of the Temple Mount doing in Mecca? Well it would seem that Jerusalem and Mecca are the same.

Yeah and chickens have lips and snakes can fly I hear you saying. Fair enough but consider, the late incredible scholar Zacharia Sitchen suggests that when the ANNUNAKI were active in Sumer, a tiny little village called Jerusalem was to the ANNUNAKI what Houston is to NASA. Remember the word Kybela? The word translates as Great Mother of the Gods, and she of course is ANTI, the wife of ANU, king 

of Nibiru, the home planet of the ANNUNAKI. Therefore, the fog begins to clear as to why a stone in a temple should be so aaaalllll important.

So why is Mecca called Mecca and not Jerusalem? I’ll work on an answer to that but for now; I suggest that it’s probably politics. Toronto used to have a suburb called the City of Scarborough, a few years back all of Toronto’s five city suburbs amalgamated into one huge city called Toronto.

Kamal Salibi wrote three books advocating the controversial “Israel in Arabia” theory. In this view, the place names of the Hebrew Bible actually allude to places in southwest Arabia; many of them were later reinterpreted to refer to places in Palestine, when the Arabian Hebrews migrated to what is now called Eretz Israel, and where they established the Hasmonean kingdom under Simon Maccabaeus in the second century B.C. In this new Israel, they switched from Hebrew to Aramaic. It was this switch in language that created the confusions that lead to the distortion of the immigrants’ stories.[15] He also argued that ‘Lebanon’ itself in high antiquity was a place in the Arabian Peninsula

The (literally) central identification of the theory is that the geographical feature referred to as הירדן, the “Jordan”, which is usually taken to refer to the Jordan River, although never actually described as a “river” in the Hebrew text, actually means the great West Arabian Escarpment, known as the Sarawat Mountains. The area of ancient Israel is then identified with the land on either side of the southern section of the escarpment that is, the southern Hejaz and ‘Asir, from Ta’if down to the border with Yemen.

The theory has not been widely accepted anywhere, and, according to Itamar Rabinowitz, had embarrassed many of his colleagues. Rabinowitz discounts anti-Semitism as the impetus for the book because Salibi “was not a sworn enemy of Israel or Zionism.” He speculates, however, that it might’ve been “an intellectual exercise” for Salibi, whom he considers a “top historian.”[12] Several academic reviewers criticized Cape for having accepted “The Bible Came from Arabia” for publication.

Salibi argued that early epigraphic evidence used to vindicate the Biblical stories has been misread. Mesha, the Moabite ruler who celebrated a victory over the kingdom of Israel in a stone inscription, the Mesha stele found in 1868, was, according to Salibi, an Arabian, and Moab was a village ‘south (yemen) of Rabin’ near Mecca. The words translated ‘many days’ actually meant ‘south of Rabin’ He shared the view of such scholars as Thomas L. Thompson that there is a severe mismatch between the Biblical narrative and the archaeological findings in Palestine. Thompson’s explanation was to discount the Bible as literal history but Salibi’s was to locate the center of Jewish culture further south.

His theory has been both attacked and supported for its supposed implications for modern political affairs, although Salibi himself made no such connection. Tudor Parfitt wrote “It is dangerous because Salibi’s ideas have all sorts of implications, not least in terms of the legitimacy of the State of Israel”.

The location of the Promised Land is discussed in chapter 15 of “The Bible Came from Arabia”. Salibi argued that the description in the Bible is of an extensive tract of land, substantially larger than Palestine, which includes a very varied landscape, ranging from well-watered mountaintops via fertile valleys and foothills to lowland deserts. In the southern part of Arabia, there are recently active volcanoes, near to which are, presumably, the buried remains of Sodom and Gomorrah.